DealBook Incorrectly Claims that SPAC Registrations Have Fallen to a Five Year Low
Yesterday's DealBook claimed that:
"...registrations dipped to a five-year low this month with only three listings for April, as the decline in initial public offerings caught up with the investment vehicles."
While it's true that s-1 filings dropped in April and the market is showing signs of slowing in general, in fact, on a monthly basis, there have been eleven months between January 2006 and today where monthly SPAC S-1 filings have dipped to three or fewer. See our analysis below:
Time to get your act together, Sorkin. Update: Looks like DealBook got our note. Click here for the article.
"...registrations dipped to a five-year low this month with only three listings for April, as the decline in initial public offerings caught up with the investment vehicles."
While it's true that s-1 filings dropped in April and the market is showing signs of slowing in general, in fact, on a monthly basis, there have been eleven months between January 2006 and today where monthly SPAC S-1 filings have dipped to three or fewer. See our analysis below:
SPAC S-1 Filing Activity: 2006 to 2008

You're asking our source again? Click on over to Edgar, folks.
Now, this isn't to say that SPAC filers are presented with signficant challenges vis-a-vis the growing backlog...Let's face it: With over 75 SPACs currently in registration with the SEC and probably another 20 to 25 foreign issuers filed on a confidential basis, the chances of making it through this backlog intact are slim.Labels: Commentary, News, Trends


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home